Case study · Sun protection

Portfolio Pricing Optimization

Measured shoppers’ willingness to pay item by item, then split the portfolio into premium and competitively priced roles.

Client

A sun protection products manufacturer

Industry

Sun protection

Result

$15MM revenue growth

Capability

Pricing Optimizer

The situation

What the client was facing.

The client wasn’t sure of the relative value of the items in its sunscreen portfolio. Prices were simply set as a gap to the main competitor. It wanted the right portfolio structure — and to find room for new products.

  • Prices set only as a gap to one competitor

  • Unclear value of each item in the portfolio

  • No view of new-product opportunities

Our approach

How we got there.

Methods used

Discrete choice analysisWillingness-to-payPortfolio price-testing tool
  1. 01

    Assessed current price gaps against competing products

  2. 02

    Ran a discrete choice analysis to estimate willingness to pay for client and competitor items

  3. 03

    Defined each item’s role — which could carry a premium and which should compete on price

  4. 04

    Built a tool to test multiple price points and their impact on the portfolio

  5. 05

    Developed optimal portfolio pricing and sized the opportunity

Value created

$15MM

revenue growth

  • Shoppers will pay substantially more for “baby” and “pure & simple” (chemical-free) products

  • Split the portfolio into regular and special-purpose items

  • Premium pricing for special-purpose items; competitive pricing for regular items

  • Sized the value of a better-optimized portfolio, with action steps to capture it

Want a result like this one?

A 30-minute walkthrough of Gazelle on a category like yours.